Wednesday, August 31, 2005

More Stalling for Plan B

An op-ed in the NYTimes recently talks about the FDA's further stalling on allowing the Morning After pill to be sold over the counter.

Last week the F.D.A. finally acknowledged that science supports granting over-the-counter access to the pill, known as Plan B, to women 17 and older. But the agency said it needed more time to ponder novel regulatory issues as well as the practical question of how to keep the pill out of the hands of younger girls.

Um, huh? You sell freaking Sudafed over the counter. Sudafed. Which gets made into fucking METH. But oh no, can't have a contraceptive that works retroactively, no, that'd be bad. This is so stupid it boggles my mind. Look, I know I get emotional about issues and can't see the other side, but ... I can't see the other side. If I was a parent and my kid was having sex and the condom broke or they weren't being safe, and she was too embarrassed to come to me, which happens (although I'd hope we'd be on a good enough level that she wouldn't be embarrassed -- but what kid isn't embarrassed to talk about sexual issues with a parent?) ... well, I'd hope she would have the option of buying this pill afterwards.

My parents (well, my mom) were very frank and open with me about sex, and you know what? If anything, that delayed any sexual activity. Friends whose parents were bigger prudes about talking sex with their kids (or never talked about it at all) ... they seem to have engaged in sexual activity earlier, for the most part. I think the biggest part of this is people wanting the government to fucking baby their kids. Listen, if you're a moron and don't tell your kids about sex -- contraception and for God's sake, consequences -- don't make the government intervene on your behalf by slapping their wrist and saying "No, no!" when they at least attempt to be responsible and buy Plan B.

If you've ever taken the Morning After Pill, and I haven't, but several of my friends have, you'd know this: It's Not Pleasant. Trust me, it is not going to become anyone's normal birth control. There is cramping and bleeding and nausea and general malaise. It's not fun and it's not pretty. Take it once and you'll remember to use a condom next time, so I'm told.

This all comes back to the idiotic sex-ed practices in this country. If we'd just teach our kids about condoms, we wouldn't have to worry about young teenagers getting their hands on Plan B anyway. But no, we pretend that it's all about the abstinence and nothing else. Abstinence is great! I recommend it for all teenagers! It sure as fuck worked for me! But seriously folks, the reality is that your teenage kids have sex. They have been doing it for ages and it's not going to stop. Please teach your kids about contraception. Teach them how to use condoms. Fucking buy them a box of them. It's not going to promote sex, it's going to make it safe if and when they choose to do it.

And, end rant. I can't say anything else at this time. Holy Frustration, Batman!

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Cannon Fires at Abortion

The only reason that I know who Nick Cannon is, is this: I read an article about him today in the Globe. Here it is, for you non-Bostonians in attendance.

Sample lyrics? Sure, y'all.

I'll always be a part of you, trust your soul, know it's always true, if I could talk I'd say to you, 'Can I live, can I live.'

Wow. Anthropomorphizing fetuses is way beyond most teenage "rappers" (I use the term loosely, I've never heard him, but I doubt he's anything next to Biggie or Tupac) ranges ... that's pretty impressive, I suppose. Like the article says, "it oversimplifies a very divisive and difficult issue. Cannon may claim he's just telling his story, but with lines such as ''Mommy, I don't like this clinic" and ''What you want, morning sickness or the sickness of mourning," it's less a thoughtful consideration of his mother's choice than one big guilt trip. Opting to be preachy and pedantic, he ignores that the ramifications of choosing not to have an abortion can be just as profound and complex as the choice to have one."

Therein lies the thing that a lot of pro-lifers forget. Choosing to have an abortion isn't something that people take lightly. It can be an agonizing decision no matter what is decided. I don't think people who are ready and able to support a child are usually the ones who are going to consider abortion. So if you're in the position, whether you decide to keep or abort the fetus, the road afterwards isn't going to be easy. This video makes the former seem like an easy choice.

I don't know; just another thing to get frustrated about. This guy's but a very minor celebrity, but apparently he knows how to get people talking.

Friday, August 05, 2005

Supreme Court Nominees

One of my friends was recently complaining about Democrats, since he seceded from our party, and about how they're always trying to throw wrenches into things. About how they should be letting Bush nominees slide right through like nothing. First I reminded him that, hello, the Republicans aren't exactly the masters of bowing gracefully out, either -- look at how noxious they were behind The Newt during Clinton's time in office. And then I said something like this:

Hey, I've elected four Democratic senators in two states. When it comes to my reproductive rights, legislating against homosexual unions, the morning-after pill becoming legal without a prescription, and stuff like that, you bet your ass I want them to fight! I want them to say, hey, Mr. Bush, you fucking chimp, it's NOT okay for you to roll us back to the times of back alley abortion clinics! It's NOT okay for you to wrap up an anti-gay marraige amendment and stick it in the constitution! It's NOT okay for you to have your crazy doctor friends tell me I can't buy emergency contraception without a prescription!

This brings us to John Roberts. I don't know much about him, even after reading everything Newsweek has had to throw at me about him. They say he's charming, charismatic, driven. He evokes John Edwards a little. He's barely 50. Nobody seems to really have a clue where the man stands. What does this mean to the court? Well, nobody's sure. A lot of SCOTUS justices turn out to be nothing like the presidents who nominated them thought they would. Roberts? I feel like he could go either way. So I don't know whether I want my reps and senators to fight him, because I don't know what he'll do. So this is all very problematic. Very.

I'm torn on this particular issue. I hope whatever happens, Roe isn't overturned. I don't want to live in that country, you know?